During an interview with Greta van Susteren Wednesday night, Bill Nelson told a whopper or two. Follow this link to read the entire transcript. Here’s the whopper Sen. Nelson told:
VAN SUSTEREN: Does the bill — does the bill cut Medicare?
NELSON: What it does is…Medicare Advantage, that is a 14 percent boost to insurance companies, which is Medicare Advantage, it’s a Medicare HMO…what it does is it tapers that out over time. But what I did was in the Finance Committee say that we need to certainly get the efficiencies over time, but it’s not fair to take it away from the people that already have this additional 14 percent. And so in the Finance Committee, I grandfathered in those that have it, particularly with regard to my state.
So that’s the lay of the land. That was done for some other states, as well.
VAN SUSTEREN: All right, that’s the Medicare Advantage. What about Medicare itself? Are people going to lose some of the benefits that they have had under this Democratic bill?
NELSON: Well, the answer to that is no. As a matter of fact, what this bill does is save Medicare in the future because if you don’t change Medicare right now, it’s going bust within a few years. This brings the cost curve down over time, so that Medicare will be solid. And where it gets the efficiencies is the doctors, the hospitals, other health care providers have to come off of some of the reimbursements that they get under Medicare. That’s how you get the efficiencies.
Medicare won’t be solid because of the Medicare cuts. That’s because the money being cut from Medicare is going to insure the uninsured. Sen. Nelson knows that because that’s what the CMS actuary testified to recently.
More significantly, though, is the fact that Sen. Nelson essentially said that the way to saving Medicare is cutting re-imbursements to doctors and hospitals.
MEMO TO SEN. NELSON: Doctors are already losing money on Medicare patients. That’s why they’re cutting down on the number of Medicare patients they treat. If Medicare is cut more, hospitals will go bankrupt. Meanwhile, doctors will either go bankrupt or retire, leaving seniors without the health care they need.
Sen. Nelson would be wise lining up a lobbyist’s job while he’s still a senator. Voting to cut Medicare isn’t the way to endear himself to Florida’s seniors. On the contrary, it’s the fastest path to joining the retirement community.
I haven’t talked much about Sen. Nelson of Florida but I’ll take the opportunity to expand on him here. I’ve never trusted him because he isn’t a principled politician. In short, he’s slippery. That isn’t where the American people are at. After dealing with President Obama, they’re looking for principled politicians whose statements don’t come with an expiration date. They want politicians that aren’t looking for the next too-clever-by-half angle to exploit.
The bottom line is that Bill Nelson is dishonest. What he isn’t is a man of gravitas.
Technorati: Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Health Care, Doctors, Hospitals, Reimbursement Rates, Bankruptcy, Retirment, Rationing, Democrats
Cross-posted at California Conservative
Entries RSS2 Feed
Comments RSS2 Feed
Proud C.C. Contributing Editor
[...] Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog [...]
Pingback by California Conservative » Blog Archive » Sen. Bill Nelson, Spinmeister • 18Dec2009 @ 11:10 am
With your assessment of Nelson as harsh as it is, should you be questioning his judgment or his motives?
Just so you know, Gary, every so often, once in a blue moon, I do step a bit beyond questioning your judgment.
Seldom, of course. In all this, we are both gentlemen.
Comment by eric z. • 19Dec2009 @ 8:22 am
Eric, We’ve had our disagreements but I’ve ALWAYS THOUGHT that you’re a decent guy.
What I don’t put up with is people who think they’re slick, that think they can flash a cheesy smile like Nelson, then expect us to believe everything he says.
Cutting $500,000,000,000 from Medicare & reducing payments to hospitals & doctors will certainly affect seniors.
Comment by Gary Gross • 19Dec2009 @ 8:55 am
Thanks Gary. On some things we are not far apart. Your later post on Nelson, etc., it is shameful how the squeeze can be applied.
I tried one comment, with links, about how the Dems are themselves having concerns over too much of a Munich appeasement to the holdouts that need to be wheedled because of the GOP not breaking the Dr. No ranks.
Too many playing politics. Too few really wanting the system to run better and be fairer to the bulk of the people.
But this new thing, a house where a majority is required but now it is sixty and that’s not in the Constitution. Make the bastards actually stand 24/7 and filibuster if that’s the thought.
It’s stupid, as it stands.
Comment by eric z. • 19Dec2009 @ 6:23 pm
Eric, I’ve rejected the “Party of No” monicker that the Democrats & their media allies have given the GOP. Just because Democrats act like we haven’t offered solutions & just because the Agenda Media hasn’t reported about the GOP’s proposals doesn’t mean the GOP hasn’t offered solutions.
In fact, I’ll bet most Democrats don’t know that the House & Senate GOP put together their alternative to the stimulus bill & that the CBO’s appraisal was that it cost less than half of the Democrats’ payoff bill & that CBO said that it’d create twice as many jobs as the Democrats’ payoff bill.
Comment by Gary Gross • 19Dec2009 @ 9:32 pm