DFL gubernatorial candidate Matt Entenza thinks that “wind industry and alternative energy will be a source of economic development for southwest Minnesota and the entire state…” In making this statement, Entenza also took the obligatory shot at Gov. Pawlenty, albeit a mild one:
The wind industry and alternative energy will be a source of economic development for southwest Minnesota and the entire state, Entenza said. But the present administration is doing little to lead Minnesota in the development of wind energy and other alternative jobs, Entenza said.
Here’s the part that thinking people will question Entenza about:
The wind industry and alternative energy will be a source of economic development for southwest Minnesota and the entire state, Entenza said. But the present administration is doing little to lead Minnesota in the development of wind energy and other alternative jobs, Entenza said.
“This is next big push in the economy for Minnesota, and the state government needs to play a role,” Entenza said.
If it’s a great investment, shouldn’t capital flow freely to it? Isn’t the best role that state government can play in any private enterprise is to get out of the investors’ way?
There’s a bigger question that Mr. Entenza hasn’t answered about state government involving itself in the building of wind farms. Specifically, why should government determine which industries get preferential treatment and which industries get stuck with higher taxes? Shouldn’t state government policy be that we’ll get out of the way for all industries?
Shouldn’t state policy avoid favoring industries that liberal special interest groups push?
Let’s have Mr. Entenza explain why it’s good to keep taxes low for industries that the DFL’s special interest allies support but it isn’t good policy to cut taxes on all businesses. Let’s remember that the last DFL legislature went tried creating a new income tax bracket this session.
Most importantly, let’s ask the biggest question: Shouldn’t small business owners across the state, whether they’re in St. Cloud, Brainerd, Alexandria, Forest Lake Eden Prairie or Jordan, demand the same treatment that Mr. Entenza is proposing to give wind energy-related businesses?
Finally, shouldn’t Mr. Entenza’s statements be interpreted as an admission that tax cuts would have a significant impact on Minnesota’s economy?
Technorati: Economy, Investments, Energy, Green Jobs, Subsidies, Taxes, Tax Cuts, Matt Entenza, Special Interests, DFL, Elections 2010
Entries RSS2 Feed
Comments RSS2 Feed
Proud C.C. Contributing Editor
Worse than that, it’s hard to imagine how there is much “economic development” involved in putting up a few windmills every month. Sure, that employs a dozen people or so, and you’ll create maybe a dozen jobs maintaining the things, but much of the money goes to the outstate manufacturers and the utilities selling “our” wind power. I mean, if we own the “public airwaves,” shouldn’t we get paid when somebody extracts energy from them? :-)
The other fallacy is that Pawlenty has done far more to build renewable energy– signing off on the ridiculous and impossible requirement of 20% by 2020– than he should have done.
What’s happening is delightful. The DFL seems determined to run their candidate for Governor against Tim Pawlenty, who will still be very popular through next year, instead of the actual Republican candidate. And if they plan to run on “saving the planet” instead of “live within your means” they’ve got a losing battle.
Comment by J. Ewing • 02Jul2009 @ 7:18 am
Wind power is a good source of electricity but it also takes up lots of space just like solar power plants.,`;
Comment by Jack Smith • 30Apr2010 @ 7:05 pm