This SCTimes Our View Editorial is a total cheap shot on their behalf. They start their editorial by saying “If it seems like we just wrote about this a few weeks ago, it’s because we did. Following the back-to-back mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, that left more than 30 people dead and dozens more injured at the beginning of August, we (as well as millions of Americans) called upon lawmakers to enact common-sense regulations to help reduce these horrifying events. And as you likely know, nothing was done.”

That’s bad enough. Still, it’s infinitely worse when they said “Then, on Aug. 31, another mass shooting occurred in Odessa and Midland, Texas. Eight people, including the shooter, were killed and 25 people, including three police officers, were injured.”

The obvious inference was that Congress had dropped the ball by not coming back early from their annual August recess and immediately passing gun control legislation. I’d love hearing the SCTimes explain what they’d recommend. Here’s what they said:

And again, as we said earlier this month, it’s time for our elected officials to try some common-sense rules when it comes to guns:

  1. Require background checks for all gun purchases online and at gun shows.
  2. Do more to regulate high-capacity weapons, like in-depth background checks, mandatory training and even liability insurance.
  3. Ramp up resources for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms so that gun sellers are reviewed more often and with more scrutiny.
  4. Fully fund comprehensive mental health care. More resources for mental health care could help prevent mass shootings.

I’d love hearing the Times explain what they’d do when they ran into things like priorities like preserving doctor-patient confidentiality statutes. Is the Times recommending the erosion of another our rights? Or is it that they just didn’t think this through?

This is an unbelievably complicated issue. What’s worse is the fact that we’re dealing with protecting our civil liberties (the Second Amendment and HIPAA protections) while attempting to protect people from suicidal maniacs. Trying to do that when everything is calm is difficult enough. Doing that while everyone is looking over our politicians’ shoulders expecting them to pull a miracle out of their hat at the snap of their fingers. Good luck with that. This video, mostly featuring Sleepy Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren, exposes the Democrats:

In the video, Sen. Warren said “Today, if it’s an average day in America, 7 children and teenagers will die from gun violence. Won’t make headlines, most of them. It’ll happen in neighborhoods that won’t get covered in the news. It’ll fall particularly hard in neighborhoods of color.” Later in the video, she chalks this up to corruption. I’d agree with that. The Democrat media isn’t interested in highlighting gang violence in Chicago. It happens virtually every weekend. That doesn’t get covered. The Democrat MSM won’t cover it because it doesn’t fit the Democrats’ narrative.

It used to be that the TV motto was “If it bleeds, it leads.” That’s ancient history now. Today’s motto is more like ‘We don’t cover it if it doesn’t fit the Democrats’ narrative du jour’. It isn’t brief or catchy but it’s the truth. If a story blows the Democrats’ narrative apart, it won’t get covered. I didn’t mean it might not get covered. I said it won’t get covered. But I digress. Back to the Times’ Our View Editorial.

It’s disgusting that the Times says nothing has gotten done. They know that it’s a complex issue. The Times (and the Democrats) know that this is an issue that can’t be fixed through demagoguery.

The only thing that demagoguery will do is drive the 2 sides further apart. The Republicans, for the most part, have acted like adults. They’ve talked about the limitations Congress has thanks to the Second Amendment and the Heller Decision. You can’t wish those away. You can’t ignore HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) rules out of existence.

What can be done is make sure that shooters don’t get ignored like they were at Parkland. That was totally preventable but we don’t talk about that because that hurts the Democrats’ narrative. Also, the Democrats don’t want people to notice that deputies acted like cowards and the sheriff pinned the blame on the NRA instead of on himself and his deputies.

There are steps that will make us safer. Unfortunately, Democrats have insisted that they don’t work or they don’t like guns in schools.

3 Responses to “The SCTimes’ 2A cheap shot”

  • Chad Q says:

    None of the “common sense” gun control laws the gun grabbing goons want to pass would have stopped any of the shootings. Evil people are going to do evil things and they will find a way to kill. Just look at the knife attacks in gun free countries.

  • eric z says:

    It is not complicated. Recognize the NRA as a Russian front, contest those funding it, and then see what happens.

    As to Chicago homicides, where is it covered, objectively and not via some right wing counter-hysteria.

    Motorcycle accidents and domestic violence likely take a far higher toll in lives than mass shootings, but that has been going on for some time. Less emotive a story.

    Also, people carrying handguns around town seems to pose a greater threat than has materialized in terms of gun fights in streets, road rage or otherwise.

    Last — The 1% screwing the 99% is a more worthwhile story and policy question, but MSM cares little to rock its own boat. Look at who owns MSM, it is the 1%. Pelosi would much prefer to talk of gun violence than the dominance of both houses of Congress by millionaires, herself as one.

  • Gary Gross says:

    What a pile of crap, Eric. I expect more from you than DFL bilge like that. The NRA is filled with Constitution-loving patriots who simply want to protect the rights that the Bible gave us. Like Ted Cruz said, throughout the Bible, people are given the right to protect their families & the right to act in self-defense. Further, the UN charter states that we have the right of self-defense.

    As for Chicago’s violence, the MSM rarely covers those stories. I’ve heard stories where local newscasters & reporters say it just isn’t news because it’s that common. What a sick thing.

    Law-abiding people carrying handguns around town aren’t the problem. It’s people with evil intent. What’s interesting is the proven fact that no NRA member has committed an act of violence with a handgun.

    Finally, the 1% isn’t screwing “the 99%” over any more than I’m the person pulling the strings in DC. Get that stupidity out of your head. I don’t care if other people make more money than me. I’m not the jealous type. Further, starting with the Clintons but also with the Obamas & now with Elizabeth Warren, big business associates itself far more often with Democrats than with Republicans.

Leave a Reply