Tina Smith couldn’t be clearer about her position on taxes. If Tina Smith was queen for a day on taxes, Minnesota and the entire nation’s economy would screech to a standstill in a New York minute.

In an interview, Smith said “Jason Lewis supported the Republican tax bill that gave giant tax cuts to big corporations and the richest among us, and I wouldn’t have supported that.” Those “giant tax cuts to big corporations” have led to companies moving back from overseas. Had Democrats been in charge, they would’ve kept the corporate tax rates at 35%, which was making the United States uncompetitive with other countries.

This isn’t a fairness issue. It’s a competitiveness issue. President Obama’s policy focused on fairness. As a direct result of that, the Obama economy grew at a sluggish pace. If Tina Smith wants to defend anemic economic growth while the US economy is booming, that’s her option. It isn’t a particularly attractive option but it’s the Democrat’s option. Further, Minnesota Republicans defeated Gov. Walz on the tax issue because money was pouring at a stronger-than-expected clip.

Lewis didn’t waste time before going after Smith’s record on the environment, highlighting Smith’s opposition to the Line 3 Pipeline project. Lewis pointed out that over 80% of the jet fuel for Minneapolis International Airport airplanes. While Smith insists that she’s fighting against special interests, she’s in bed with Twin Cities-based special interests opposed to mining on the Range.

“Senator Smith has a record of working hard for the people of Minnesota, taking on powerful special interests and working across the aisle to get things done, whether it’s fighting to protect health coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, standing up to the big drug companies to lower prescription drug prices or making sure young people have the skills they need to fill high-demand jobs,” Furlong said.

Right now, there are more job openings than there are people to fill those jobs. That means 3 things. The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act that Jason Lewis voted for is working. The deregulation that happened through the use of the Congressional Review Act has revived entire communities, especially in the Rust Belt states of Ohio and Pennsylvania. Lewis voted for most, if not all, of the deregulation. Third, it means that Democrats were wrong to unanimously vote against the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act.

No Democrats in the House or Senate voted for the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act. That means that Democrats were terribly wrong on economic policy. The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act took a barely-growing economy and kicked it into a higher gear virtually immediately. When Smith says that she wouldn’t have voted for the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act, she’s telling Minnesotans that she would’ve voted against the policies that jump-started the economy.

Do we really want to vote for a senator that wouldn’t vote for prosperity-inducing policies? Do we really want to vote for a senator who is totally controlled by special interests that’ve stopped Iron Range prosperity, that have killed blue collar jobs and that would’ve stopped the US from becoming energy independent?

If killing jobs, undermining national security and preventing Iron Range prosperity are your highest priorities, then Tina Smith is your candidate. If you want prosperity, then voting for Jason Lewis is imperative.

7 Responses to “Jason Lewis v. Tina Smith on taxes, Iron Range jobs”

  • eric z says:

    And tariffs. Your headlining left out tariffs.

    In any event from the image it already looks as if Lewis is working on growing a full head of Trump hair. All he needs is the orange color, a weight gain, . . .

  • Gary Gross says:

    I wish tariffs weren’t needed to break China but they are. If that’s what’s required to get China to stop stealing our companies’ intellectual property that’s worth billions of dollars, then that’s what we should use. If China goes bust, that’s THEIR problem.

  • Chad Q says:

    Yeah because standing up for America in today’s twisted society is a bad thing. Got to knock America down a few more pegs so we are no better than the rest of the world. Nest time just say “orange man bad”.

  • eric z says:

    Will Jason Lewis run against:
    1. Tina Smith
    2. AOC
    3. Nancy Pelosi
    4. All of the above

    My guess, No. 4

  • eric z says:

    Apology, Gary. Your Aug 22 post answers why Lewis is running and who he is running against. Had I read it more than scanning, I’d not have posted the 1-4 item above. The Aug 22 post is thorough. Do you know who besides Lewis himself is going to be managing the Lewis campaign? Has he named a staff?

  • Gary Gross says:

    Don’t sweat it, Eric. I’ve forgotten it. You can too. I’ve seen a couple of his staff but I don’t know their names. I’ll say this about them, though: they’re impressive on first impression.

    BTW, here’s an interesting tidbit of information that I don’t know if you knew: Jason Lewis often had Paul Wellstone on his radio program to discuss various issues. They both thought of each other as true friends. Interesting, isn’t it?

  • Gary Gross says:

    I agree with that.

Leave a Reply