Search
Archives

You are currently browsing the archives for the NFL category.

Categories

Archive for the ‘NFL’ Category

It’s clear that the NFL hasn’t figured its customers out yet. That’s because the “NFL said on Friday it has no plans to mandate players stand for the U.S. national anthem, but will rather present a possible solution on how to end the controversial protests when it meets with team owners next week.”

During a conference call, NFL spokesman Joe Lockhart said “(Goodell) has a plan that he is going to present to owners about how to use our platform to both raise awareness and make progress on issues of social justice and equality in this country. What we don’t have is a proposal that changes our policy, we don’t have something that mandates anything. That’s clear. If that was the case I doubt the head of the NFLPA would have put a joint statement out with us.”

What’s clear is that the NFL and NFLPA have morphed into activist organizations aligned with the DNC. They aren’t seen as sports league as much as they’re seen as political activists. That’s why the NFL’s TV ratings continue to stumble and NFL attendance is underperforming. Ed Morrissey got it right when he said “NFL fans expect Sunday football to be an escape from the politicization of all things.” These protests got identified as partisan displays when this happened:

Quite frankly, the NFL’s PR team stinks. They haven’t even identified the things that their customers demand. That tin-eared approach is killing them. For all their insults of President Trump, they’re rank amateurs compared with him in identifying with the NFL’s fans. President Trump gets it. Commissioner Goodell doesn’t. DeMaurice Smith hasn’t figured it out either.

Since the NFL’s anti-Trump protests, the NFL has deployed several too-clever-by-half strategies. The NFL also issued a statement that suggested that NFL players would stand during the National Anthem:

Goodell made it clear in the letter, obtained by ESPN’s Adam Schefter, that he wants players to stand during the anthem. He did not provide specifics on how he intends to ensure it, but he wrote that it would “include such elements as an in-season platform to promote the work of our players on these core issues.”

It’s clear that Commissioner Goodell’s memo was a PR stunt aimed at getting this issue off the front page.

It’s doubtful that the NFL, especially this commissioner, will ever figure out their fans.

This article is filled with misinformation. That isn’t surprising considering the fact that it quotes Tony Covington, the NAACP’s Senior Director of Corporate Affairs. In the article, Covington is quoted as saying “Jerry Jones’ comments are more than tone-deaf, more than misinformed and misguided – they are a public commitment by an NFL owner to violate his players’ Constitutional right to free speech, one of the principles on which our nation was founded. They are proof that athletes like Colin Kaepernick who have quietly and peacefully used their platform to protest violence against communities of color do so at their own peril.”

Actually, that’s one of the myths that keeps popping up in articles. (I wish these reporters did their homework.) This article sets things straight, quoting Daniel Schwartz, employment law partner at Shipman & Goodwin, as saying “As a general rule, the First Amendment doesn’t apply to the private workplace.” Later, he adds that “the First Amendment prevents government, but not companies or individuals, from limiting free speech.”

It’s indisputable that the players’ sideline protests have hurt NFL attendance and TV ratings. Team owners, like Jerry Jones, have the right to protect their investment. When their employees’ actions hurt their profitability, the owner has the right to install a code of conduct for his employees with the stipulation that it’s applied equally to each employee.

This article outlines what’s permitted and what isn’t:

Here’s what Baruch had to say (his comments have been edited and condensed for clarity):

1. Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said Sunday that any player who disrespects the flag won’t play in Cowboys games. What are the legal ramifications to a statement like that?
Probably none. He’s a private employer so he’s free to make any rules he wants that infringe on free speech. He’s totally unconstrained legally.

That definitely isn’t the answer the NAACP wanted to hear, though it’s the answer they probably already knew.

Technorati: , , , ,

Two weekends ago, players, coaches and owners locked arms in their fight against President Trump, certain that they’d show President Trump who the king of the proverbial jungle was. According to this article, stadiums “across the US and even further afield became the focus of an unprecedented show of defiance against US President Donald Trump Sunday, as some NFL players locked arms or refused to stand for the national anthem, saying that they are protesting racial and social injustice. Players from all 28 teams in the league that played Sunday participated in some form of protest. Some teams declined to take the field at all for the pre-game ceremonies.”

This afternoon, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell essentially cried uncle, admitting that President Trump was right. In the article, ESPN’s Kevin Seifert wrote that the “NFL has developed a plan to “move past” its ongoing debate about player protests during the national anthem and could enact it next week, commissioner Roger Goodell wrote Tuesday in a letter to all 32 teams. Goodell made it clear in the letter, obtained by ESPN’s Adam Schefter, that he wants players to stand during the anthem. He did not provide specifics on how he intends to ensure it, but he wrote that it would ‘include such elements as an in-season platform to promote the work of our players on these core issues.'”

Here’s a copy o Commissioner Goodell’s letter to the owners:

It was inevitable that Trump would win. It was just a matter of time.

Technorati: , , ,

TMZ caught up with a rapper whose stage name is Common to get his take on Jerry Jones’ comments about the players standing during the national anthem. It isn’t a stretch to think that this is a PR stunt. Common said “It’s an owner mentality. Like a slave owner mentality, to be honest. Like, ‘You gonna do what I say on this.’ Other people [are] choosing to put their hands over their heart. What makes that gesture better than somebody else who might be praying during the national anthem?’ he asks. ‘Or if somebody says, ‘I’m kneeling for what I believe in,’ then they should be able to do that because that’s what this country is about.'”

Common is partially right in that Jones is acting like an owner, though not like a slave owner. Jones has lots of money tied up in his team. He has every right to protect his investment, as do the other owners. Right now, the players’ political activism is dragging the NFL’s value down. Their next TV contract isn’t likely to be nearly as lucrative as the one they currently have because the NFLPA’s political activism is turning off its fans. That’s indisputable.

President Trump’s initial comments were initially greeted with contempt by the players. Still, the fans have largely sided with him. When the man with the world’s biggest megaphone criticizes you, it’s gonna sting financially. He’s essentially forced the owners’ hands. Jerry Jones didn’t become a billionaire by ignoring the fans. That’s why he’s siding with President Trump.

If the players were smart, something that’s still in doubt, they’d stop their sideline protesting ASAP.

In what was a predictable decision, ESPN suspended Jemele Hill after she criticized Cowboys owner Jerry Jones. ESPN’s statement said “Jemele Hill has been suspended for two weeks for a second violation of our social media guidelines. She previously acknowledged letting her colleagues and company down with an impulsive tweet. In the aftermath, all employees were reminded of how much individual tweets may reflect negatively on ESPN and that such action would have consequences. Hence this decision.”

Just as predictably, Al Sharpton weighed in on Hill’s suspension, saying “We consider it outrageous that Jemele Hill was suspended by ESPN. She has the right to tell people that they ought to let advertisers know how they feel, since they are the consumers. While she didn’t call for a direct boycott, it’s not off the table for us in the civil rights community.” Sharpton is demanding that ESPN meet “with civil rights leaders about Jemele Hill?.” Knowing how connected ESPN is with the Democratic Party, that will likely happen.

FNC’s Brian Kilmeade responded to Hill’s comments in this interview:

Frankly, she’s lucky she still has a job. She’s a mediocre talent with a big mouth and a penchant for saying stupid things that hurt her employer. Of course, if ESPN fired her, a leftist organization likely would immediately hire her and portray her as a civil rights hero, which she isn’t.

Here’s the tweet that got Hill suspended:

If the rationale behind JJ’s stance is keeping the fanbase happy, make him see that he is underestimated how all of his fanbase feels.

In this article, Barrett Holmes Pitner wrote “On Monday, ESPN suspended SportsCenter co-host Jemele Hill for two weeks after she took to Twitter to recommend fans who disagreed with Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones’ stance on kneeling during the national anthem—Jones said that Cowboys players who “disrespect the flag” will not play for his team—should boycott the Cowboys’ advertisers. Regardless of whether you agree with ESPN’s decision or Hill’s statements, her suspension demonstrates how America is far more equipped to silence black voices than address our complex racial dynamics.”

Hill got suspended because her statements have the potential to hurt her employer’s profitability and ESPN’s biggest revenue producer. Frankly, Hill’s actions are that of a political activist. They aren’t the actions of a sports show host. If she’s that intent on being a political activist, then she should quit ESPN and go to work for MSNBC or CNN. She’d fit right in.

Technorati: , , , ,

Apparently, San Francisco safety Eric Reid doesn’t like it when politicians protest his political protest. Vice President Pence walked out of the Colts-49ers game when “23 members of the team took a knee during the national anthem in Indianapolis.”

After the game, Reid responded, saying “He knew our team has had the most players protest. He knew we were probably going to do it again. And so this is what systemic oppression looks like — a man with power comes to the game, tweets a couple things out and leaves the game with an attempt to thwart our efforts.”

The players’ efforts are to be political activists who wear football uniforms to their protests. When the NFLPA signed up to do political activism with George Soros, they hoped it wouldn’t get noticed. They tried pretending that they were fighting injustice. Now that they’re exposed, they’re upset when VP Pence gives them a taste of their own medicine. That isn’t systemic oppression. That’s what happens when amateurs try playing politics with the big boys.

As usual, CNN’s Brian Stelter gets a little unhinged:

Stelter opined that this was staged. He might be right, though I couldn’t prove it either way. It’s a little rich, though, to hear NFL political activists complain about staging an event. That’s a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Thanks to these protests, the NFL’s popularity has dropped significantly:

August Winston Poll

MLB/61 percent favorable to 13 percent unfavorable.
NFL/57 percent favorable to 23 percent unfavorable.
College football/53 percent favorable to 16 percent unfavorable.
College basketball/48 percent favorable to 17 percent unfavorable.
NBA/47 percent unfavorable to 23 percent unfavorable.

September Winston Poll

MLB/63 percent favorable to 16 percent unfavorable.
College football/51 percent favorable to 21 percent unfavorable.
NBA/46 percent favorable to 28 percent unfavorable.
College basketball/45 percent favorable to 25 percent unfavorable.
NFL/44 percent favorable to 40 percent unfavorable.

If the NFL continues with its protests, they should expect the NFL’s popularity drop some more. They’ve barely scratched the surface. If the NFLPA continues their protests, they’ll be less popular than Harvey Weinstein is with his former company.

The NFL can’t get out of its own way. This week, Vice President Mike Pence left the Indianapolis-San Francisco game when players knelt during the playing of the National Anthem. After finding out that the NFLPA has partnered with George Soros, I’ve decided the product just isn’t good enough for me to put up with that crap.

Ed’s column expresses my frustration with the NFL perfectly. In his column, Ed wrote “NFL fans expect Sunday football to be an escape from the politicization of all things. There are many reasons for this — but a not insignificant one is that taxpayers provide publicly funded stadiums to billionaire owners and millionaire players for almost every team in the league. We are all footing the bill for NFL players’ workplaces. Why should they become venues for partisan protest?”

Thanks to DeMaurice Smith being the executive director of the NFLPA and a member of President Obama’s transition team, partisanship was inevitable. If I had to pinpoint a turning point, I’d highlight the NFL Draft when ESPN celebrated Michael Sam getting drafted by the then-St. Louis Rams by showing Sam kissing his boyfriend. That’s when I started noticing the NFL’s political agenda.

Another step in the NFL’s demise happened when Commissioner Goodell didn’t respond appropriately when Ray Rice hit his then-fiancé as they exited a casino elevator:

Then Goodell gave Greg Hardy a slap on the wrist for allegedly beating up his girlfriend. At some point, it’s impossible to conclude anything except the fact that these players, owners and commissioner are a bunch of out-of-touch elitists who couldn’t identify with their fans if their lives depended on it. (Their lives don’t depend on it but their livelihoods do.)

After leaving the game, Vice President Pence tweeted “I left today’s Colts game because @POTUS and I will not dignify any event that disrespects our soldiers, our Flag, or our National Anthem.”

I’m writing off the NFL as much as possible. I won’t pretend that I’ll never watch another game. I’ve been a fan since 1968, when only road games were televised. It’s difficult to give up an addiction like that. I won’t have a problem admitting that the NFL is my least favorite of the major sports, with basketball finishing a close second.

A month ago, the public was essentially told that the NFLPA was just getting started on the political activism front. According to this article, that’s been exposed as BS.

According to the Washington Times’ reporting, “Tax documents released by 2ndVote show the NFLPA donated $5,000 in 2015 to the Center for Community Change Action, a group active in the anti-Trump resistance and bankrolled by a host of liberal foundations, including top Democratic donor George Soros’s Foundation for Open Society. A member of the AFL-CIO, the NFLPA also contributed in 2013 and 2015 to Working America, the AFL-CIO’s community affiliate, which Open Secrets said spent $1 million in 2016 to defeat Trump.”

Later, the article reports that “Working America has since mobilized against the Republican tax-cut framework, denouncing it as the ‘Trump tax scam.’ The NFLPA contributed $5,000 in 2014 to Jobs with Justice, another pro-union group backed by Soros, and $5,000 in 2013 to the progressive Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy.”

I’m definitely familiar with Working America. In 2014, they essentially were the Zach Dorholt campaign. I’m familiar with them because I wrote about them in this post.

Working America’s About Us page says “Together, and in solidarity with working people across the country, we fight for our common interests—good jobs, affordable health care, education, retirement security, corporate accountability and real democracy. We want to ensure our kids have a quality education, our grandparents don’t have to decide between paying for their monthly medication or paying for food and that we will have a secure retirement when our working days have ended.”

It isn’t surprising that the NFLPA is tied into Soros. That’s because DeMaurice Smith, the NFLPA’s exec director, was part of President Obama’s transition team. Of course, they’ll have ties to Soros and other unions. This is interesting:

The Center for Community Change, whose 2015 annual report lists Planned Parenthood as a donor, plans to honor Democratic mega-donor Tom Steyer at its Oct. 12 awards dinner recognizing “heroes on the front lines of resistance.”

I’m not surprised. Since the NFL protests started, I’ve repeatedly said that the NFLPA has become another wing of the Democratic Party.

Technorati: , , , ,

Now that the Las Vegas police have released the video disproving Michael Bennett’s statements following the Mayweather-McGregor fight, the question now becomes whether NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell will suspend Michael Bennett for lying about what happened that night. That night, Bennett accused Las Vegas police officers of telling him that if he moved, they’d “blow my fucking head off”, adding that “I felt helpless as I lay there on the ground handcuffed facing the real-life threat of being killed.” Bennett also said that the officers “singled me out and pointed their guns at me for doing nothing more than simply being a black man in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

The police videos “shows a 3-man police team, made up of 2 Hispanic officers and 1 black officer, identify Bennett as a suspicious person who did not get down on the ground as ordered during the hotel sweep.” This TMZ video goes through Bennett’s claims in great detail:

According to TMZ, the police detained Bennett but didn’t arrest him after they saw him hunched over and trying to escape the casino after they’d told people to stop running and to lay flat on the ground. At no point did any of the police officers threaten to blow Bennett’s [expletive] head off.

If anyone thinks that Bennett’s lie will help him or the NFL, they’re foolish. It isn’t possible that this turns out well for Bennett or the NFL. The question now becomes whether NFL Commissioner Goodell has the spine to suspend Bennett for lying about a police officer. Commissioner Goodell has the authority to do that under the NFL’s Personal Conduct Policy, which states “Prohibited conduct includes but is not limited to the following:

  1. Actual or threatened physical violence against another person, including dating violence, domestic violence, child abuse, and other forms of family violence;
  2. Assault and/or battery, including sexual assault or other sex offenses;
  3. Violent or threatening behavior toward another employee or a third party in any workplace setting;
  4. Stalking, harassment, or similar forms of intimidation;
  5. Illegal possession of a gun or other weapon (such as explosives, toxic substances, and the like), or possession of a gun or other weapon in any workplace setting;
  6. Illegal possession, use, or distribution of alcohol or drugs;
  7. Possession, use, or distribution of steroids or other performance enhancing substances;
  8. Crimes involving cruelty to animals as defined by state or federal law;
  9. Crimes of dishonesty such as blackmail, extortion, fraud, money laundering, or racketeering;
  10. Theft-related crimes such as burglary, robbery, or larceny;
  11. Disorderly conduct;Crimes against law enforcement, such as obstruction, resisting arrest, or harming a police officer or other law enforcement officer;
  12. Conduct that poses a genuine danger to the safety and well-being of another person; and
  13. Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL personnel.

Disobeying a police officer’s command certainly fits under the heading of disorderly conduct. It likely fits under the heading of undermining or putting at risk the integrity of the NFL, too. At some point, Commissioner Goodell must display common sense, which he hasn’t done the last 3-4 years. Commissioner Goodell must also display some leadership, which he’s never shown.

Personally, I’m betting that Commissioner Goodell won’t show a spine. I’m betting he’ll let Bennett disrespect police officer with impunity. I’m betting that’s what happens because that’s who Goodell is.

Technorati: , , , , , , , , ,

I have a thought experiment for the ill-informed idiots that think NFL players have the right to protest during the National Anthem. Many of the NFL’s best players make millions of dollars each year. For the record, I don’t begrudge them for that because they’re the best in the business.

Many of these players invest their money in businesses. Those businesses, in turn, establish codes of conduct for their employees. The NFL players that establish codes of conduct for their employees are now arguing that their actions are protected by the First Amendment. There’s a thought experiment question that Colin Kaepernick, Michael Bennett and others haven’t addressed.

Specifically, would these NFL players who own businesses have the right to terminate employees who hurt the NFL players’ businesses? If not, why wouldn’t they have that right? I’d argue that they have that right because they should have the right to protect their investment. I suspect that most players who are entrepreneurs would agree with that statement.

If that’s the case, shouldn’t NFL owners have the right to cut or discipline players that hurt the NFL as a product? Shouldn’t NFL owners have the right to protect their investments? After all, these are billion-dollar investments. People that think businesses don’t have the right to protect their brand aren’t too bright. Let’s not kid people. These protests have hurt the NFL:

It sounds like the NFL has figured it out that their political activism isn’t helping their product. I’m certain that most NFL owners are liberal, as are the media that cover them. I don’t think for a split-second that the NFL is motivated by anything other than restoring ratings. They didn’t suddenly grow patriotic.