February 22nd, 2010 • 8:20 amThank You, Bill Bennett

If I had the opportunity, I’d personally thank Bill Bennett for his NRO op-ed in which he demolishes the false premises that Glenn Beck espouses. Here’s the best shot Dr. Bennett gives Mr. Beck:

Second, for him to continue to say that he does not hear the Republican party admit its failings or problems is to ignore some of the loudest and brightest lights in the party. From Jim DeMint to Tom Coburn to Mike Pence to Paul Ryan, any number of Republicans have admitted the excesses of the party and done constructive and serious work to correct them and find and promote solutions. Even John McCain has said again and again that “the Republican party lost its way.” These leaders, and many others, have been offering real proposals, not ill-informed muttering diatribes that can’t distinguish between conservative and liberal, free enterprise and controlled markets, or night and day. Does Glenn truly believe there is no difference between a Tom Coburn, for example, and a Harry Reid or a Charles Schumer or a Barbara Boxer? Between a Paul Ryan or Michele Bachmann and a Nancy Pelosi or Barney Frank?

For months, these people, along with Eric Cantor, Thad McCotter, John Shadegg, John Boehner, Lee Terry, Jeb Hensarling, Scott Garrett and Patrick McHenry have said that the Republican Party lost its way. Michael Steele told Glenn in an interview on his TV show that there’s no reason why Glenn should trust Republicans on spending until they show that they’ve changed their ways. Steele’s answer, which is the right answer, impressed Glenn so much that he held Steele over for a second segment.

Still, Beck insists that there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats. Simply put, that requires Beck to ignore the votes that Republicans have taken against the stimulus bills, President Obama’s budgets, Pelosicare/Obamacare, etc.

Yes, it’s true that I still worry about Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, George Voinovich and Lindsey Graham but I’m not the least bit worried in the House. Yes, it’s true that I’d worry about Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee spending too much because that’s their history. I wouldn’t worry about Sarah Palin or Tim Pawlenty spending too much because they’ve vetoed bill after bill that would’ve spent too much.

Based on that information, why should I listen to Glenn Beck when he goes on one of his frequent rants against the Republicans? I’ve said this before and I’ll repeat it again: if a person’s credibility is shot, they’ve got nothing. At this point, Beck’s credibility on this issue is nonexistent. It’s time that Mr. Beck started speaking based on the facts of today, not the things that happened years ago.

Third, to admit it is still “morning in America” but a “vomiting for four hours” kind of morning is to diminish, discourage, and disparage all the work of the conservative, Republican, and independent resistance of the past year. The Tea Partiers know better than this. I don’t think they would describe their rallies and resistance as a bilious purging but, rather, as a very positive democratic reaction aimed at correcting the wrongs of the current political leadership. The mainstream media may describe their reactions as an unhealthy expurgation. I do not.

Glenn Beck’s anti-big spending diatribes are like a shot from a sawed-off shotgun. My criticisms of individual Republicans are more like shots fired from a finely tuned target rifle. Beck’s criticisms are just as likely to hit innocent bystanders as anyone. My criticisms only hit the people who’ve misbehaved.

I still appreciate the great research work that Glenn Beck has done. His work outing the radicals in President Obama’s administration, from Van Jones to Cass Sunstein to John Holdren, has been outstanding.

I’ll close this post with this observation from Dr. Bennett:

The first task of a serious political analyst is to see things as they are. There is a difference between morning and night. There is a difference between drunk and sober. And there is a difference between the Republican and Democratic parties. To ignore these differences, or propagate the myth that they don’t exist, is not only discouraging, it is dangerous.

Technorati: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cross-posted at California Conservative

Post Comments RSS Feed Post Comments RSSTrackBack URI 10 Responses

  1. There is a fundamental difference between EVERY Republican and EVERY Democrat. Obamacare passed with 60 Democrats for and 40 Republicans against. Now there are 41 Republicans. Does anybody want to say there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between those two circumstances? Party identification alone isn’t fully indicative of how an individual votes, unfortunately, but it’s a darn good guide when your choice is one or the other.

    Comment by J. Ewing • 22Feb2010 @ 9:07 am

  2. Hearing ‘mia culpa’ from GOP legislators, who set the stage for the current Dem majority (McCain, Bush, Bennett, et al.), means pretty dam little when the Tea party movement has a knife to their throat.
    1: If we head toward socialism at 20 mph or 200 mph, we’re still headed in the same direction. THAT is the reason tea partiers see little difference ‘tween the (old?) GOP & Dem’s.
    It is time to head in a different direction!

    Comment by Eric Heins • 22Feb2010 @ 11:23 am

  3. The way the GOP must ‘prove’ itself to the likes of Beck and myself is by cleaning house COMPLETELY. Dump all the neo-cons (Bennett & Cheney) and RINOs (Snow & McCain). Then we’ll talk. Until then kiss my Harry Heiny

    Comment by Eric Heins • 22Feb2010 @ 11:29 am

  4. If you demand total purity, you’re preaching the gospel of being in the permanent minority. Thankfully, there’s far more people who are buying into the TEA Party movement, a return to proper constitutional boundaries & limited government. If you require running out all of the candidates & legislators you deem unworthy of conservative support, then I’ll know that you’re a spoiled brat.

    I’d strongly encourage you to pick up your ball & go home so that mature people can get down to the serious business of being a principled political party.

    Comment by Gary Gross • 22Feb2010 @ 12:31 pm

  5. If we head toward socialism at 20 mph or 200 mph, we’re still headed in the same direction. THAT is the reason tea partiers see little difference ‘tween the (old?) GOP & Dem’s.

    As a TEA Party organizer, I haven’t heard any TEA Party activists say that there hasn’t been a change in how Republicans are voting now vs. when they were the majority party. It’s sad to see you haven’t noticed that we ARE heading in a vastly different direction. Perhaps if you stopped your whining & if you started doing research, you would’ve noticed that.

    Comment by Gary Gross • 22Feb2010 @ 12:37 pm

  6. Well, I’ll just put it this way. The Republicans blew their opportunities in Congress and somewhat in MN too. This says to me that they aren’t ‘true believers’ in constitutionally limited gov’t and free markets. Too many of those same people remain in office for me to trust the GOP’s recent moves to placate. I will judge them by their actions. In the mean time if I get a chance to replace them with people willing to DO something to scale back gov’ts AND in the process punish the old GOP’ers … I’m all over that.
    The ‘permanent minority / electability’ argument worked when GWB used it. It don’t fly any longer with me.

    Comment by Eric Heins • 22Feb2010 @ 4:01 pm

  7. Big tent?

    But Gary, Tea Party sentiment is not pro-GOP. It is anti-establishment, and the GOP is half of the two party establishment.

    Never mind the difference here, there. The Tea Party discontent is not a bunch of people saying, “Yippee, we’ are going to get co-opted by the GOP.” I don’t see any but the Bachmann-Palin fringe calling it that, and they’re outside that real Tea Party tent looking in.

    Comment by eric z. • 22Feb2010 @ 8:02 pm

  8. Gary:

    I’ve tried to post a couple of times on this and my computer lost the post when I hit entered.

    Keep in mind:

    One, Beck’s criticism is the leadership that doesn’t seem to get it. The NRSC for example is wanting to give us Crist (who wants the stimlus plan) or Carli in California (who supports cap and trade just like Boxer). The Republicans in New York 23 gave us a liberal Republican who supported health care and when she thought she was going to lose dropped out and endorsed the democrat while her name on the ballot caused the Democrat to win.

    Two, Beck is a recovering alocholic. He knows how important it is for people to admit that we have a spending problem. Yes a lot of Republicans have voted right on major bills, but a couple supported the stimulus bill, a couple supported the so called jobs bills, a couple supported cap and trade, a bunch wanted earmarks.

    And three, what is wrong with reminding people that we have a spending problem and cut spending!

    Walter Hanson
    Minneapolis, MN

    Comment by walter hanson • 22Feb2010 @ 10:39 pm

  9. Beck never said there was no difference between the two parties, only that the difference at large was a matter of degrees. It is possible to analyze a party’s general course without disparaging those individuals within it who are making good decisions.

    Guys who beat their wives say their sorry too. Until they stop with the beatings, it doesn’t really matter.

    Comment by Walter Scott Hudson • 24Feb2010 @ 11:36 pm

  10. Beck has said that there isn’t any difference between the parties. I know because I watch his show. His credibility shrinks when he says it, then praises the Republicans who actually believe in limited government & constitutional principles.

    During his CPAC speech, he complained that he hasn’t heard Republicans say that they overspent during the Bush years. That either means he’s lying, he’s ignorant or he doesn’t consider Mike Pence, Jim Demint, Tom Coburn, Thaddeus McCotter, Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul, John Shadegg, Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor & John Boehner to be Republicans.

    That’d be a pretty neat trick considering Rep. McCotter is chairman of the House GOP Policy Committee, Rep. Cantor is the Minority Whip, Rep. Boehner is the Minority Leader & Rep. Pence is the chairman of the House GOP Caucus.

    Comment by Gary Gross • 24Feb2010 @ 11:55 pm





Categories

20 Most Recent Posts