Saying that Dr. Eric Sprankle is a totally sick puppy is understatement. Dr. Sprankle is an associate professor at Minnesota State, Mankato. He’s also the subject of this article, which highlights Dr. Sprankle’s tweet that God didn’t get Mary’s consent when He impregnated her. Here’s Dr. Sprankle’s tweet:

A brief scan of Dr. Sprankle’s Twitter feed shows that he’s quite interested in Satanism. In my estimation, that makes his accusations about God more than a little questionable. Consider this passage in the Gospel of Luke:

26 Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, 27 to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. 28 And having come in, the angel said to her, “Rejoice, highly favored one, the Lord is with you; [e]blessed are you among women!”
29 But when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and considered what manner of greeting this was. 30 Then the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. 31 And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name Jesus. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David.
33 And He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom there will be no end.” 34 Then Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I do not know a man?”
35 And the angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God.
36 Now indeed, Elizabeth your relative has also conceived a son in her old age; and this is now the sixth month for her who was called barren. 37 For with God nothing will be impossible.”
38 Then Mary said, “Behold the maidservant of the Lord! Let it be to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her.

Nowhere in this passage does Mary object. Mary asked a simple question. The angel Gabriel answered Mary’s question. Once the angel answered Mary’s question, Mary replied “Let it be to me according to your word.”

Further, though it’s difficult to explain, Mary gave birth to Jesus as a virgin. I fully admit that I can’t explain it. That doesn’t mean it isn’t the truth. It simply means I can’t biologically explain how Mary got pregnant. It’s something I accept as an article of faith.

If Dr. Sprankle wants to say it’s crazy for me to accept things I can’t see as an article of faith, I have this simple reply: I’ve never seen Dr. Sprankle’s brain. Does that mean that trusting he has a brain mean I’m crazy? I rest my case.

2 Responses to “Dr. Sprankle, one sick puppy”

  • eric z says:


  • J. Ewing says:

    There is at least one other virgin birth on record; it is not impossible. During the civil war, a mini-ball passed through a soldier’s testicle and lodged in the womb of a young virgin, who later gave birth.

    And one doesn’t have to believe the whole New Testament, yet it is the obligation of Satan and his minion’s to nit-pick every little detail to weaken the Faithful.

    To paraphrase an old quote, “there are three kinds of people in the world: fools, damn fools, and professors.”

Leave a Reply